Pubblicato sul Financial Times dell’8 luglio:
“Ogni volta che i leader del G8 si riuniscono per i loro incontri annuali, un elaborato rituale si svolge al fine di garantire che le conversazioni interne siano mantenute riservate.[…] Degli inservienti italiani hanno invece ascoltato gli incontri segreti del G8 in stanze vicine con delle cuffie. […] Ciò equivale a spionaggio.”
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds
Firma per il VENETO INDIPENDENTE!
I 120 Dogi della Serenissima Repubblica di Venezia
Iutane, fa na picola donasion!
Veneto è chi il Veneto fa
il pnv su facebook
twitter
Scottish National Party, SNP
BlogoSquare
New blog post: Il Financial Times: «gli italiani spiano gli incontri riservati del G8» http://bit.ly/vp1mJ
Even more strange, a witness said, was the presence in the high-security area of Bruno Vespa, a veteran television host favoured by Mr Berlusconi, most recently in explaining his friendship with an 18-year-old model which led his wife to ask for a divorce. Mr Ventura denied Mr Vespa had been able to listen to the confidential talks.
This recall me a recent article published by an italian journalist, which shown, in short, a dilemma: to be at the cutting edge of the news it is required to stay aside with those are the policymakers, the politicians, even though this lead to a sort of submission and de-facto makes the journalist not free. What I criticized about that sentece was that a journalist, similarly to an investigator, could exploit information by the aid of infiltrated, while he/she must keep far away from the scene of the news that he/she is documenting.
Under this perspective, how faithful and realiable could be the news given by Mr Bruno Vespa, while he is staying so close to those are subject of the news that he’s going to document?
I think the italian journalism is dangerously immature, strongly biased by the involved parties, and eventually unfree and unfaith.